We currently have Risks that are not relevant for assessment, but we still want to have them in ARCM with all their details. The problem is that when the risk-management relevant attribute is deactivated, some of the detail information is removed from the Risk in arcm. Such as Risk category and risk owner and reviewer.
According to support this is standard behavior, but it doesn't seem logical. Therefore this request is created so that deactivating "risk management relevant" attribute would only disable generation of assessments but rest of the Risk data would remain the same in ARCM.
We agree to this request. We, as well, would need risk category and risk owner, although our risks are not relevant for risk-management. (e.g. process risks as a base for control tasks. These are not actively risk-managed, but need to be categorized and also need an owner for reporting, statistics and read privileges.)
This request is quite old. Could R&D or Product Owner please comment on the status? Thank you!